1993 NBA Draft
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1989-90 Utah |
Did Not Play Ineligible |
|||||||||||||||||
1990-91 Utah |
32 |
42.9 |
34.3 |
66.3 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
3.0 |
1.5 |
8.7 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Utah |
35 |
44.0 |
39.6 |
78.0 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
5.1 |
1.8 |
12.1 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Utah |
31 |
47.4 |
36.2 |
75.9 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
5.7 |
2.8 |
12.5 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
98 |
44.9 |
37.0 |
74.5 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
4.6 |
2.0 |
11.1 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Georgia Tech |
35 |
55.9 |
--- |
44.1 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
7.5 |
0.5 |
7.2 |
||||||||
1990-91 Georgia Tech |
30 |
55.1 |
00.0 |
59.7 |
0.5 |
1.8 |
10.7 |
1.0 |
15.3 |
||||||||
1991-92 Georgia Tech |
35 |
54.6 |
00.0 |
68.3 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
9.0 |
1.5 |
15.8 |
||||||||
1992-93 Georgia Tech |
30 |
53.0 |
00.0 |
63.8 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
10.2 |
1.4 |
15.6 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
130 |
54.5 |
00.0 |
62.1 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
9.3 |
1.1 |
13.3 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Faulkner State C.C. |
27 |
55.4 |
N/A |
64.4 |
N/A |
N/A |
11.2 |
N/A |
17.4 |
||||||||
1990-91 Faulkner State C.C. |
37 |
58.1 |
N/A |
78.4 |
N/A |
1.5 |
13.2 |
N/A |
26.6 |
||||||||
1991-92 Southern |
30 |
48.1 |
25.4 |
72.4 |
3.1 |
1.1 |
12.2 |
1.9 |
22.4 |
||||||||
1992-93 Southern |
30 |
45.0 |
45.7 |
69.7 |
2.5 |
0.8 |
10.1 |
1.8 |
20.6 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
60 |
46.6 |
38.8 |
71.2 |
2.8 |
1.0 |
11.2 |
1.9 |
21.5 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1988-89 Louisiana State |
25 |
46.3 |
--- |
40.7 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
2.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
|||||||||
1989-90 Louisiana State |
Did Not Play Redshirted |
|||||||||||||||||
1990-91 Louisiana State |
27 |
42.3 |
00.0 |
81.8 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
4.6 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Louisiana State |
29 |
40.3 |
--- |
51.7 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.7 |
0.4 |
2.4 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Louisiana State |
32 |
49.7 |
00.0 |
73.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
10.2 |
1.9 |
15.3 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
113 |
47.1 |
00.0 |
68.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
4.7 |
0.8 |
6.5 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Michigan State |
28 |
54.5 |
--- |
62.8 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
5.8 |
0.7 |
5.3 |
||||||||
1990-91 Michigan State |
30 |
62.7 |
--- |
68.0 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
6.9 |
0.5 |
7.7 |
||||||||
1991-92 Michigan State |
30 |
63.2 |
--- |
68.8 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
8.6 |
1.1 |
13.3 |
||||||||
1992-93 Michigan State |
28 |
63.9 |
00.0 |
66.7 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
10.0 |
1.4 |
14.5 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
116 |
62.1 |
00.0 |
67.0 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
7.8 |
0.9 |
10.2 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1988-89 Rancho Santiago C.C. |
4 |
50.0 |
--- |
60.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
3.8 |
0.5 |
4.8 |
||||||||
1989-90 Rancho Santiago C.C. |
34 |
53.6 |
--- |
58.5 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
8.2 |
1.6 |
13.9 |
||||||||
1990-91 Rancho Santiago C.C. |
37 |
58.9 |
--- |
66.5 |
1.6 |
2.4 |
9.0 |
2.9 |
19.5 |
||||||||
1991-92 Cincinnati |
34 |
47.9 |
00.0 |
55.6 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
6.3 |
2.0 |
8.2 |
||||||||
1992-93 Cincinnati |
21 |
55.0 |
--- |
56.6 |
1.8 |
0.8 |
8.1 |
2.2 |
11.3 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
55 |
51.1 |
00.0 |
55.9 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
7.0 |
2.1 |
9.4 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Delaware |
26 |
41.2 |
--- |
46.9 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
0.3 |
2.7 |
||||||||
1990-91 Delaware |
23 |
44.4 |
--- |
57.1 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
8.9 |
0.5 |
7.6 |
||||||||
1991-92 Delaware |
31 |
55.0 |
--- |
59.4 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
8.8 |
0.9 |
10.7 |
||||||||
1992-93 Delaware |
30 |
51.5 |
--- |
75.8 |
1.3 |
3.2 |
12.2 |
0.9 |
19.2 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
110 |
50.2 |
--- |
67.1 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
8.3 |
0.7 |
10.5 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 San Jacinto C.C. |
38 |
49.6 |
44.6 |
80.0 |
2.9 |
0.6 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
21.3 |
||||||||
1990-91 San Jacinto C.C. |
31 |
49.5 |
39.4 |
80.5 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
5.1 |
7.6 |
23.5 |
||||||||
1991-92 Florida State |
31 |
45.4 |
35.4 |
70.4 |
1.8 |
0.3 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
18.4 |
||||||||
1992-93 Florida State |
35 |
50.2 |
38.2 |
75.9 |
2.8 |
0.3 |
4.3 |
4.9 |
18.3 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
66 |
47.8 |
36.6 |
73.4 |
2.3 |
0.3 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
18.3 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1991-92 Tau Ceramica |
18 |
63.4 |
20.0 |
71.4 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
0.9 |
6.5 |
||||||||
1992-93 Tau Ceramica |
31 |
56.6 |
38.7 |
69.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
4.0 |
1.7 |
10.8 |
||||||||
Totals |
49 |
60.0 |
29.3 |
70.6 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
3.2 |
1.3 |
8.6 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1988-89 New Orleans |
Did Not Play Redshirted |
|||||||||||||||||
1989-90 New Orleans |
32 |
57.9 |
--- |
56.1 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
6.8 |
0.9 |
6.3 |
|||||||||
1990-91 New Orleans |
30 |
57.2 |
--- |
53.7 |
0.7 |
2.5 |
12.2 |
1.1 |
12.7 |
|||||||||
1991-92 New Orleans |
32 |
58.4 |
--- |
71.3 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
11.1 |
1.8 |
15.4 |
|||||||||
1992-93 New Orleans |
29 |
61.9 |
--- |
67.4 |
0.9 |
2.7 |
11.9 |
0.6 |
18.4 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
123 |
59.1 |
--- |
64.6 |
0.9 |
2.4 |
10.5 |
1.1 |
13.1 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1989-90 Mississippi Valley State |
Did Not Play |
|||||||||||||||||
1990-91 Mississippi Valley State |
18 |
40.8 |
--- |
20.0 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
2.3 |
--- |
2.3 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Mississippi Valley State |
30 |
45.3 |
--- |
61.8 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
5.8 |
0.2 |
4.9 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Mississippi Valley State |
28 |
45.3 |
00.0 |
55.1 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
7.5 |
0.1 |
12.9 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
76 |
44.9 |
00.0 |
55.5 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
5.6 |
0.1 |
7.2 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1988-89 Kentucky |
32 |
48.4 |
31.5 |
71.3 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
8.7 |
2.9 |
14.3 |
|||||||||
1989-90 Arizona |
Did Not Play Transfer Student |
|||||||||||||||||
1990-91 Arizona |
35 |
51.9 |
34.4 |
74.6 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
6.2 |
1.9 |
15.6 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Arizona |
31 |
50.6 |
31.5 |
77.7 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
7.9 |
2.4 |
16.3 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Arizona |
28 |
52.0 |
48.3 |
83.6 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
7.9 |
1.9 |
20.4 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
126 |
50.8 |
37.5 |
76.7 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
7.6 |
2.3 |
16.5 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 North Carolina State |
30 |
59.2 |
--- |
38.1 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
2.8 |
0.4 |
3.3 |
||||||||
1990-91 North Carolina State |
31 |
60.5 |
--- |
57.1 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
7.7 |
1.3 |
8.6 |
||||||||
1991-92 North Carolina State |
30 |
62.4 |
--- |
57.2 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
8.2 |
1.9 |
15.6 |
||||||||
1992-93 North Carolina State |
27 |
54.3 |
14.3 |
57.9 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
9.1 |
2.0 |
15.5 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
118 |
58.8 |
--- |
56.3 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
6.9 |
1.4 |
10.6 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1989-90 Alabama |
Did Not Play Redshirted |
|||||||||||||||||
1990-91 Alabama |
33 |
47.0 |
41.8 |
69.9 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
3.9 |
1.2 |
16.8 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Alabama |
34 |
44.5 |
35.8 |
71.2 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
4.1 |
2.2 |
19.4 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Alabama |
29 |
42.0 |
35.1 |
68.2 |
1.6 |
0.7 |
4.5 |
2.3 |
20.6 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
96 |
44.4 |
37.1 |
69.7 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
4.1 |
1.9 |
18.9 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Lincoln Trail C.C. |
33 |
47.4 |
N/A |
81.3 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
10.2 |
||||||||
1990-91 Lincoln Trail C.C. |
32 |
51.5 |
43.7 |
85.4 |
N/A |
N/A |
4.8 |
6.3 |
20.4 |
||||||||
1991-92 Clemson |
28 |
41.0 |
41.9 |
76.7 |
1.5 |
--- |
3.3 |
5.8 |
13.4 |
||||||||
1992-93 Clemson |
30 |
44.1 |
40.8 |
80.2 |
2.4 |
0.1 |
4.1 |
6.4 |
15.7 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
58 |
42.7 |
41.3 |
78.8 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
6.1 |
14.6 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
||||||||
1989-90 Connecticut |
32 |
38.6 |
31.3 |
62.3 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
5.5 |
1.8 |
8.2 |
||||||||
1990-91 Connecticut |
31 |
44.0 |
34.3 |
59.2 |
3.6 |
1.3 |
7.5 |
3.1 |
12.7 |
||||||||
1991-92 Connecticut |
30 |
45.3 |
39.6 |
61.1 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
6.1 |
2.9 |
16.3 |
||||||||
1992-93 Connecticut |
26 |
41.1 |
34.5 |
76.0 |
2.4 |
1.1 |
6.0 |
2.1 |
16.1 |
||||||||
DIV I Totals |
119 |
42.6 |
35.7 |
64.0 |
2.6 |
1.1 |
6.3 |
2.5 |
13.1 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1990-91 Loyola Marymount |
28 |
58.9 |
00.0 |
68.3 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
7.6 |
0.4 |
16.4 |
|||||||||
1991-92 UCLA |
Did Not Play Transfer Student |
|||||||||||||||||
1992-93 UCLA |
33 |
49.8 |
28.6 |
59.8 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
6.2 |
0.9 |
11.8 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
61 |
54.3 |
22.2 |
64.4 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
6.9 |
0.7 |
14.1 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review
|
Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
SEASONS |
GP |
FG% |
3PT% |
FT% |
SPG |
BPG |
RPG |
APG |
PPG |
|||||||||
1988-89 Iowa |
Did Not Play Redshirted |
|||||||||||||||||
1989-90 Iowa |
22 |
44.0 |
33.3 |
73.9 |
0.5 |
2.3 |
3.5 |
1.1 |
6.0 |
|||||||||
1990-91 Iowa |
32 |
50.3 |
100.0 |
66.5 |
0.9 |
3.3 |
6.7 |
1.5 |
16.3 |
|||||||||
1991-92 Iowa |
30 |
53.3 |
--- |
66.7 |
1.0 |
4.0 |
7.8 |
0.9 |
19.5 |
|||||||||
1992-93 Iowa |
32 |
50.5 |
00.0 |
70.1 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
8.9 |
1.3 |
16.9 |
|||||||||
DIV I Totals |
116 |
50.8 |
28.6 |
68.0 |
1.0 |
3.1 |
7.0 |
1.2 |
15.3 |
- Details
- Written by The Draft Review